<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GeekExtreme &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekextreme.com/category/reviews/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekextreme.com</link>
	<description>So cool, we run at zero Kelvin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:56:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Which is better? (or Joomla vs. WordPress)</title>
		<link>http://www.geekextreme.com/reviews/which-is-better-or-joomla-vs-wordpress-8597</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekextreme.com/reviews/which-is-better-or-joomla-vs-wordpress-8597#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gil Rutkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joomla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content management systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drupal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opensource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP programming language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress vs. Joomla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekextreme.com/?p=8597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve worked with Open Source publishing software for the last decade or so, and it seems that every so often two packages get pretty powerful or popular and the debates begin.  Most recently it&#8217;s been Joomla and WordPress in the spotlight. First of all, I&#8217;m not going to do (in this post) an extremely in-depth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="lw_context_ads"><p>I&#8217;ve worked with <a class="zem_slink" title="Open Source" rel="wikinvest" href="http://www.wikinvest.com/concept/Open_Source">Open Source</a> publishing <a class="zem_slink" title="Computer software" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_software">software</a> for the last decade or so, and it seems that every so often two packages get pretty powerful or popular and the debates begin.  Most recently it&#8217;s been <a class="zem_slink" title="Joomla!" rel="homepage" href="http://joomla.org/">Joomla</a> and <a class="zem_slink" title="WordPress" rel="homepage" href="http://wordpress.org">WordPress</a> in the spotlight.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8618" title="WordPress vs. Joomla - Which one is better" src="http://www.geekextreme.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/wordpress-vs-joomla2.png" alt="WordPress vs. Joomla - Which one is better" width="500" height="293" /></p>
<p>First of all, I&#8217;m <em>not </em>going to do (in this post) an extremely in-depth comparison of the pros and cons of each of these wonderful packages.  Why?  Because, quite simply, it&#8217;s an apples to oranges comparison.  Although both <em>can</em> do, or can be <em>extended</em> to do, most of the same things they&#8217;re both very different animals and should be treated as such. <span id="more-8597"></span></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re <a class="zem_slink" title="Question" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Question">asking the question</a> &#8220;which is better&#8221;, Joomla or WordPress, then I&#8217;ll have to break out some blunt honesty &#8212; you need to do your homework or hire someone to help you analyse your needs and break it all down for you.  The truth is both are better at specific things and based on your individual needs, <em>you&#8217;ll</em> need to decide which is better for <em>you</em>.</p>
<h2>A general overview:</h2>
<h3>Joomla</h3>
<p>Joomla is a full blown <a class="zem_slink" title="Content management system" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_management_system">content management system</a>.  It&#8217;s an attempt to be everything to everyone and overall, it does just that.  It has the ability to manage content in various styles and has a &#8220;front page&#8221; component that does a good job of displaying content in chronological order allowing it to emulate a blog.  Over the last few years, it has evolved into a &#8220;framework&#8221; of sorts, allowing developers to rather easily use native functions of the CMS (Database abstraction, user system, etc&#8230;) to create native extensions and modules or port existing php software into Joomla extensions.</p>
<p>Content is managed in a rather ridged Section and Category <a class="zem_slink" title="Taxonomy" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxonomy">taxonomy</a>.  Each content item can be assigned a single category and each category can be assigned a single section.  Content can be displayed by section, category or in aggregate form and can be displayed in a few different formats including tables/lists and blog-style.  Access to content can be controlled by a very basic group security scheme.</p>
<p>Templating can be as simple or robust as you&#8217;d like it to be.  Both open source and commercial templates are widely available if you don&#8217;t have the skills or resources to create your own.  Templates all consist of a main component &#8220;Content&#8221; area and unlimited &#8220;Module&#8221; areas and can be assigned site-wide, or by section and category.</p>
<h3>WordPress</h3>
<p>WordPress is a simple and powerful blogging platform that has evolved the ability to manage content.  It&#8217;s not trying to be everything to everyone but can be extended to most of the things Joomla can do.  It thrives at blogging, but does have the ability to create and manage content pages.  Like Joomla, WordPress also has a robust <a class="zem_slink" title="Application programming interface" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_programming_interface">API</a> allowing for developers to create native plugins and widgets or port existing php software into WordPress plugins.</p>
<p>Content is managed using a very flexible Category / Sub-Category taxonomy. Content items can be assigned to several categories and sub-categories and can be displayed by any of the assigned classifications.  It also natively supports another taxonomy call &#8220;tags&#8221;.  Tags are simply subject classifications and content can also be displayed based on it&#8217;s tags.</p>
<p>Templateing in WordPress, like Joomla, can be anything you make of it.  Open source and commercial templates are widely available.  Although the template structure and syntax is significantly different from Joomla, templates also consist of a main content area and unlimited widget (or module) areas.  Recently, several WordPress theme &#8220;frameworks&#8221; have cropped up making templating more easily extensible.</p>
<h2>Overall</h2>
<p>Both platforms can probably do what you want them to do.  WordPress is geared more to blog publishing, but can manage a pretty tricked out <a class="zem_slink" title="Website" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website">website</a>.  Joomla is geared more at people that need a corporate style publishing system and can run a full-fledged corporate site, but if you want to use it for a blog, it can definitely handle the job.</p>
<h2>Whats Next&#8230;</h2>
<p>In the coming weeks, I&#8217;ll continue this comparison in a bit more depth.  I&#8217;ll also tell you about GeekExtreme and why we switched from Joomla to WordPress.  We may also throw a third publishing system, <a class="zem_slink" title="Drupal" rel="homepage" href="http://drupal.org">Drupal</a>, into the mix and confuse everyone a bit more.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/2d456853-64c3-468c-bad7-ab03d01a6b91/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=2d456853-64c3-468c-bad7-ab03d01a6b91" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekextreme.com/reviews/which-is-better-or-joomla-vs-wordpress-8597/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MGE Vigor 500W Power Supply</title>
		<link>http://www.geekextreme.com/technology-news-archives/mge_vigor_500w_power_supply-2-4108</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekextreme.com/technology-news-archives/mge_vigor_500w_power_supply-2-4108#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Historical Archive</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[{mosimage} Back to the matter at hand. Though the Vigor may be the low man on the totem pole, so to speak, it&#8217;s certainly no slouch. In today&#8217;s PSU market, you&#8217;ve got to differentiate your product if you want it to sell, &#38; the Vigor&#8217;s certainly got a lot of &#8220;extra&#8217;s&#8221; that make it a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="lw_context_ads"><p>{mosimage}<br />
Back to the matter at hand. Though the Vigor may be the<br />
low man on the totem pole, so to speak, it&#8217;s certainly no slouch. In<br />
today&#8217;s PSU market, you&#8217;ve got to differentiate your product if you<br />
want it to sell, &amp; the Vigor&#8217;s certainly got a lot of &#8220;extra&#8217;s&#8221;<br />
that make it a PSU worth looking into. Let&#8217;s check it out.<br />
{mosgoogle}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>The Vigor&#8217;s box declare&#8217;s that it&#8217;s SATA &#8220;enabled,&#8221; which,<br />
unfortunately, means that it it doesn&#8217;t have the native SATA connectors<br />
that you&#8217;ll find on the Magnum and the Vortec. Don&#8217;t fret, however, as<br />
XG has included two molex-to-SATA power adapters if you&#8217;ve got a new<br />
drive that doesn&#8217;t have both power connectors on it.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosgoogle}</p>
<p>{mospagebreak title=MGE Vigor &#8211; Continued}<br />
Out of the box, you&#8217;ll immediately notice that there are lots of things<br />
that differentiate this PSU from the majority of PSU&#8217;s on the market.<br />
First, instead of having an exhaust fan mounted at the rear of the<br />
unit, XG has placed a second 80mm intake fan on the exterior, inside<br />
your case.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>I felt that this was a good idea, as it lead to<br />
less noise in the rear of the case. The second thing you&#8217;ll notice is<br />
that this baby&#8217;s got windows! Each side of the Vigor has a blue<br />
plexiglass window that lets the lights from the LED fans (two of &#8216;em)<br />
shine through.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>The bottom of the unit is vented via the<br />
second LED fan, this time a nice, hefty 120mm job.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>The rear<br />
of the unit is fan-less, but well vented in the honeycomb style.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>The back also sports a fan speed control knob so<br />
that you can quiet the fans down if you feel the need.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosgoogle}</p>
<p>{mospagebreak  title=MGE Vigor &#8211; Finish and Specs}<br />
Other things that set this unit apart are the looming &amp; the finish.<br />
All of the Vigor&#8217;s cable leads are loomed with blue nylon, making wire<br />
management much easier. I also appreciated the extra grip that they<br />
provided on the power connectors &#8211; no more wiggling to pull &#8216;em out.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>The finish on the exterior of the unit is<br />
almost mirror-like.  After taking all of my photos, I<br />
found myself wiping it down to get my greasy paw-prints off.. it&#8217;s that<br />
nice.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>On to the specs.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>I was a bit worried about the Vigor,<br />
because the combined output on the 5.5v &amp; 3v rails was only listed<br />
as a total of 220W; a bit lower than I was used to. However, my<br />
concerns were un-founded, as you&#8217;ll see below in my voltage<br />
measurements. I measured the voltage using Asus&#8217; PC Probe software. The<br />
system setup is as follows:</p>
<table class="moduletable" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>CPU</td>
<td>Athlon FX-53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RAM</td>
<td>2 x 512MB Corsair PC3200 Pro</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MOBO</td>
<td>Asus A8V Delux</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Video Card</td>
<td>Asus FX5900 Ultra (256MB)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hard Drives</td>
<td>2 x WD Raptors</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other</td>
<td>LiteOn DVD ROM</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>{mosgoogle}</p>
<p>My previous PSU was an Enermax Noisetaker 370W (EG375P-VE-SFMA) which<br />
has dual 12v rails, &amp; a higher rating on the combined 5.5v &amp; 3v<br />
rails. I was to discover, however, that the extra juice that the Vigor<br />
kicked out was more than sufficient to keep up. What I did to test was<br />
read the lowest voltage output of each reading on the Asus software,<br />
&amp; run a variety of tasks: at idle, while gaming, &amp; while<br />
watching a DVD. Without further ado, here are the results:</p>
<div></div>
<table class="contentdescription" border="0" width="360" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
Enermax</td>
<td>idle</td>
<td>load &#8211; gaming</td>
<td>load &#8211; DVD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>vcore</td>
<td>1.536</td>
<td>1.52</td>
<td>1.536</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3.3v</td>
<td>3.344</td>
<td>3.328</td>
<td>3.344</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5v</td>
<td>5.107</td>
<td>5.107</td>
<td>5.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>12v</td>
<td>11.369</td>
<td>11.308</td>
<td>11.308</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="contentdescription" border="0" width="360" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>MGE Vigor</td>
<td>idle</td>
<td>load &#8211; gaming</td>
<td>load &#8211; DVD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>vcore</td>
<td>1.536</td>
<td>1.536</td>
<td>1.536</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3.3v</td>
<td>3.36</td>
<td>3.334</td>
<td>3.334</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5v</td>
<td>5.187</td>
<td>5.16</td>
<td>5.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>12v</td>
<td>11.369</td>
<td>11.369</td>
<td>11.308</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As you can see, the Vigor bested the Enermax in almost every category.<br />
Although the Enermax was rated much lower, I feel that the dual 12v<br />
rails &amp; the higher 5v &amp; 3.3v output rating made it a decent<br />
match-up. The Vigor is certainly a solid performer, &amp; I never<br />
experienced any issues with it. It is, in fact, still in my primary<br />
gaming rig right now, &amp; will stay there until, perhaps, I get a<br />
Magnum to review <img src='http://www.geekextreme.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>{mosgoogle}</p>
<p>{mospagebreak title=MGE Vigor &#8211; Action Shots}<br />
But wait, you&#8217;re saying, what about the action shots?!?!? I save the best for last, my friends. Feast your eyes on these:</p>
<p>Here we see the bottom 120mm fan.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a nice shot<br />
of the window getting its good use, along with the 80mm intake fan.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosgoogle}</p>
<p>This is what the unit looks like from the rear when<br />
powered up</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>Finally, if you think that adding a PSU<br />
with lights doesn&#8217;t really affect the look from the outside of your<br />
case, check out this shot, with the Enermax installed</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>&amp;<br />
compare it to this shot, with the Vigor installed</p>
<p>{mosimage}.</p>
<p>Definite<br />
noticable improvement, especially in the<br />
upper left corner there. And finally, for those of you who still don&#8217;t<br />
think MGE/XG has anything to offer, check out this shot of the MGE<br />
Titanium case &amp; the MGE Vigor all in one awesome shot. Yes, that&#8217;s<br />
right, everything in this shot came as-is. No extra purchases except<br />
for the CPU fan.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosgoogle}</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekextreme.com/technology-news-archives/mge_vigor_500w_power_supply-2-4108/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MGE Titanium ATX Case</title>
		<link>http://www.geekextreme.com/technology-news-archives/mge_titanium_atx_case-4054</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekextreme.com/technology-news-archives/mge_titanium_atx_case-4054#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Historical Archive</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum/steel construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fan control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal side screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantum Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slot tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason&#8217;s I needed to move on from my plexiglass case were twofold. The first issue was space: the placement of the hard drives in the case was such that the ATX connector was directly beneath them, with very little clearance, &#38; there was only room enough to mount two 3.5&#8243; drives &#38; two 5.25&#8243; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="lw_context_ads"><p>The reason&#8217;s I needed to move on from my plexiglass case were twofold.<br />
The first issue was space: the placement of the hard drives in the case<br />
was such that the ATX connector was directly beneath them, with very<br />
little clearance, &amp; there was only room enough to mount two 3.5&#8243;<br />
drives &amp; two 5.25&#8243; bays. The second issue was that my Vantec<br />
rheobus had up &amp; died on me, &amp; all of my fans were then blowing<br />
on full speed, making a horrendous racket. The rheobus was obviously<br />
the straw that broke the camel&#8217;s back, so I started looking for a new<br />
one.</p>
<p>While looking for a rheobus, I began thinking that I&#8217;d like some more<br />
functionality in my next one. I needed a fan controller, sure, but I<br />
was also liking the idea of front panel audio, USB, &amp; firewire<br />
connections &amp; a temperature monitor. My search was leading me in<br />
the direction of such panels as the Aerocool CoolPanel, which currently<br />
retail for around fifty bucks. At this point, I thought to myself, why<br />
not just spend another $50 while I&#8217;m at it, &amp; solve my space issues<br />
as well? Furthermore, panels with extra functionality such as the<br />
CoolPanel that also control more than three fans were few &amp; far<br />
between.</p>
<p>Looking for a case with more than three fan controllers, a temperature<br />
monitor, &amp; front panel audio, USB, &amp; firewire connectors all<br />
rolled into one package really narrows down the search quite a bit. I<br />
also had plenty of PSU&#8217;s laying about, so I didn&#8217;t need a case that<br />
came with one included. When I saw the MGE Titanium at Newegg, I knew I<br />
was sold right away. Interestingly enough, however, you won&#8217;t find the<br />
Titanium case on MGE&#8217;s website. Not only that, but they&#8217;ve got links to<br />
another website, XGBox.com, that includes photos of another case,<br />
manufactured by XG, that looks strikingly similar to the Titanium, but<br />
in black, &amp; named the &#8220;Quantum.&#8221;</p>
<p>I looked around the web some, &amp; discovered that there were plenty<br />
of reviews of the XG Quantum, but very few, (read: one) of the MGE<br />
Titanium. The Case with boxsimilarities between the two cases are way<br />
more than similarities. They&#8217;re the exact same case in different<br />
colors. A quick email to MGE inquiring about the two cases, &amp; the<br />
apparent lack of the Titanium on MGE&#8217;s website fetched a reply from the<br />
marketing manager of MGE himself, Arthur Marquez. Arthur explained to<br />
me that the Titanium was the original design of the Quantum case, &amp;<br />
that MGE had originally created the Titanium as an office-use case.<br />
Someone somewhere in MGE decided that this thing was obviously bad-ass<br />
enough to market to gamers, so they painted it black &amp; called it<br />
the Quantum. Throw in the fact that XG, or Xtreme Gamer, is a<br />
subsidiary of MGE, &amp; everything starts to fall into place. Not only<br />
that, but Arthur noted my attention to the lack of information<br />
regarding the Titanium on MGE&#8217;s website, &amp; now the XG Quantum&#8217;s<br />
product page refers to it as both the Quantum and the Titanium. (The<br />
whole &#8220;lighter gamers&#8221; bit I don&#8217;t quite get, but that&#8217;s another story<br />
 <img src='http://www.geekextreme.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><img title="The MGE Titanium" src="/images/stories/reviews/mge_titanium/case_exterior.jpg" alt="The MGE Titanium" width="600" height="674" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The MGE Titanium</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 634px"><img class="  " title="MGE Titanium" src="/images/stories/reviews/mge_titanium/case_and_box.jpg" alt="" width="624" height="595" /><p class="wp-caption-text">MGE Titanium</p></div>
<p>Let&#8217;s get down to business, shall we? First of all, this<br />
thing is a beast. When I saw on the website that it was built of both<br />
steel and aluminum, I knew it was going to be a heavy case<br />
(15.8kg/35lbs) but it still managed to exceed my expectations. When I<br />
went to pick it up from the receiving dock, I was a bit shocked. My<br />
first thought was, &#8220;is this thing going to fit under my desk?&#8221; As you<br />
can see in the shot above, however, the case is thankfully much smaller<br />
than the box that it ships in. The packaging is, without a doubt,<br />
sturdy. The foam inserts in the box are not styrofoam, like most.<br />
They&#8217;re actually the spongy, shipping foam (I really don&#8217;t know how<br />
else to describe it, but I hope you get what I mean). This is a<br />
definite plus for me, because I keep all of my case boxes for moving,<br />
&amp; this case would easily go back into its box if necessary.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>Once I<br />
got it out of the box, &amp; my fears were assuaged, the second thing<br />
that I noticed was that this case was looong. My fears about the height<br />
were misplaced, because I&#8217;d been looking at the package the wrong way.<br />
This case is actually much longer than most, but about the same height<br />
as most. The aluminum/steel construction made the case extremely<br />
sturdy; not wobbly like most all-aluminum cases. The entire front door<br />
is made of solid aluminum, &amp; feels Manual, backplate,<br />
screwsactually quite heavy for such a light metal. This is a good spot<br />
for the specs, so let&#8217;s throw those in here (from the XGBox page):</p>
<div>SPECIFICATIONS</div>
<table class="moduletable" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Type</td>
<td>Mid ATX Tower</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mainboard</td>
<td>ATX</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Expansion Slots</td>
<td>7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Drive Bays</td>
<td>5.25 x 5 Open Bay</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>3.25 x 2 Open Bay</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>3.25 x 3 Hidden</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Power Supply</td>
<td>N/A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cooling System</td>
<td>2x92mm Side Fans</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>1x92mm Top Fan</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>1x80mm Rear Fan</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Top I/O Ports</td>
<td>IEEE1394, USB2.0&#215;2, Audio</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dimensions</td>
<td>558 x 219 x 477 mm (DxWxH)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Material</td>
<td>1.0mm SECC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Color Options</td>
<td>Silver / Black</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>{mospagebreak title=MGE Titanium ATX Case &#8211; Photos}</p>
<p>Ok, ok, time for the photos. If you guys&#8217;ve read my rantings thus far,<br />
you know that: a. I&#8217;m impressed with this case, &amp; b. you want to<br />
see more shots of it. So here we go; click on all thumbnails for larger<br />
images.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>Above you can see the two-door design for the front bezel. The design<br />
makes it very easy to get in &amp; add or remove 5.25&#8243; devices as<br />
necessary. Access to the front bezel can be controlled by a lock on the<br />
right side of the case. The front panel also holds one 80mm fan, which,<br />
well-intentioned as it may be, is nearly strangled for lack of a proper<br />
intake. The fan&#8217;s intake butts up against the rear of the case&#8217;s LCD<br />
panel, &amp; the only way that air can get in is through a small slot<br />
in the bottom of the front door. I believe that XG would have done<br />
better to simply leave this fan out, under the circumstances. In the<br />
first shot, you can see the back side of the LCD panel. The panel&#8217;s<br />
clock &amp; date functions are kept alive by a standard CR2032 battery.<br />
The functions of the case are also well documented with small<br />
instructional stickers. The one next to the side door lock is probably<br />
the most useful. Lastly we see the top 80mm fan exhaust and front panel<br />
ports. The inverse of the front 80mm fan, the top fan is constricted<br />
due to a poorly vented exhaust port. Both of these fans provide<br />
negligible airflow, but they do provide light, so I guess there&#8217;s some<br />
aesthetic value there.</p>
<p>{mospagebreak title=MGE Titanium ATX Case &#8211; More Photos}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mospagebreak title=MGE Titanium ATX Case &#8211; Components Installed}</p>
<p>One of the most unique things about this case is its use of side<br />
&#8220;vents&#8221; instead of the more traditional (I can&#8217;t believe I just said<br />
that) windows. The vents still give you a good view of the case&#8217;s<br />
interior, especially because it&#8217;s so well lit (more on that on the next<br />
page). To go along with the vents, XG has included two 92mm fans on an<br />
interesting hinged panel, which swings open for access to the main body<br />
of the case. These fans also have intake filters. I found the panel<br />
very easy to work with while open, &amp; after some wire management,<br />
there was no interference from the fans at all. One thing that puzzled<br />
me about the panel was the presence of three notched, rubber-footed<br />
rails (for lack of a better word). You can see these at the top left of<br />
the third photo above. I couldn&#8217;t figure out what they were there for,<br />
nor were they referred to in the manual. All fans inside the case were<br />
XG-branded, &amp; of the blue LED flavor. You can also see the<br />
underside of the top 80mm fan with the front panel connectors here. The<br />
3.5&#8243; drive bay came filled with all of the drive rails necessary for<br />
mounting any devices in the case; plenty were available. The bay itself<br />
is secured with a single thumbscrew, &amp; slides out for easy<br />
installation. The rails for the 3.5&#8243; drives were a bit different than<br />
what I&#8217;m used to. They simply push into place, &amp; are held there by<br />
the fit of the drive into the bay; e.g. they fall off rather easily if<br />
the drive isn&#8217;t in the bay. Not horribly bad, but could be an<br />
inconvenience. The 5.25&#8243; rails seem to stay on much better.</p>
<p>Installation into this case was an absolute breeze. There is so much<br />
room in this thing that you don&#8217;t feel cramped in the slightest. plenty<br />
of room for your hands &amp; fingers, &amp; no sharp edges to boot.<br />
This is where the length of the case comes into play. It&#8217;s so deep that<br />
a regular ATX board still has about three inches of clearance before<br />
the drive bays. Check the images below to see what I mean. That&#8217;s an<br />
ASUS A8V &amp; 5900Ultra in there. I&#8217;m using a Swiftech MCX6400-V with<br />
another 92mm blue LED fan from my old case.</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>I know, I know, I need to spend a little more time on wire management.<br />
But hey, it&#8217;s really not all my fault. There are a ton of leads for<br />
things running around in there (USB, Firewire, audio, temperature<br />
probes) that are impossible to tame. In the second shot above, you can<br />
see the screwless PCI slot tools. I didn&#8217;t have too much of an issue<br />
with these, but the 5900Ultra had to go in at an angle. They flip open,<br />
then slide up. In the third shot, you can see what I mean about the<br />
extra room in this case. I think a full ATX board may even fit in this<br />
thing. No clearance issues whatsoever. In the last shot, you can see<br />
the (nearly) fully populated fan controller power headers. There&#8217;s room<br />
for a total of seven, but I&#8217;ve only got six hooked up. This makes a<br />
difference in the LCD display, as you&#8217;ll see shortly.</p>
<p>{mospagebreak title=MGE Titanium ATX Case &#8211; MORE Photos}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>{mosimage}</p>
<p>Here are a couple of &#8220;action&#8221; shots. The first shot is of the front<br />
fan. Very nice lighting effect, but you can also see where the fan&#8217;s<br />
intake on the bezel door doesn&#8217;t line up 100% flush with the intake in<br />
the bezel itself. It&#8217;s not off by much, but it is noticable. In the<br />
second shot, you can see what the case looks like from the side while<br />
powered up. Notice that the top 92mm side fan is fully within the<br />
screen area, while the bottom 92mm side fan is not. MGE have remedied<br />
this by adding a second, smaller grate beneath the circular screen.<br />
Here&#8217;s where the intake screens on each of the fans are a huge plus.<br />
The metal side screen is just as good as a window, in my opinion, but<br />
with the added bonus of allowing full airflow. The case and processor<br />
temperatures are the lowest I&#8217;ve ever personally experienced for a case<br />
this quiet.</p>
<p>{mospagebreak title=MGE Titanium ATX Case &#8211; The LCD}</p>
<p>The LCD</p>
<p>I can hear you now, &#8220;BUT WHAT ABOUT THE LCD?!?!?&#8221; I&#8217;ve saved the best<br />
for last, of course <img src='http://www.geekextreme.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  You can see the LCD in action in this thirteen<br />
second .avi. (3.56MB) The CPU temperature is an Athlon FX-53 with the<br />
Swifty cooler I mentioned earlier. The hard drive temperature is of two<br />
Raptors in Raid0. Not bad for a system I just played thirty minutes of<br />
CS:S on, don&#8217;t ya think? Across the top is the display for the seven<br />
fan speeds. The bars fill or empty as you raise or each fan&#8217;s RPM.<br />
Notice that the display for fan number seven is blinking; this is<br />
because I don&#8217;t have a seventh fan hooked up to the controller. The<br />
empty header&#8217;s display blinks constantly whenever the PC is powered up.<br />
Below the speed bars you will see the read-out for each of the fans in<br />
the system. The LCD will cycle through each fan &amp; tell you each<br />
ones actual rotation speed. You can also have it sit on one fan&#8217;s<br />
readout if you want, then manually cycle through each fan using the<br />
buttons below the LCD. On either side of the RPM read-out you&#8217;ll find<br />
the power LED on the left, &amp; the HDD activity light on the right.<br />
Next down the line are the read-outs of the three temperature probes,<br />
followed by the date &amp; finally the time. XG have done a bit more<br />
sprucing-up of their Titanium/Quantum product page over the last coupel<br />
of days. Check out their interactive (.swf) demo of the LCD here.<br />
Pressing the key button on the LCD will lock its functions so that<br />
nothing gets set accidentally. There&#8217;s also a user&#8217;s manual at their<br />
site here (.pdf) that&#8217;s much more detailed than the small booklet they<br />
give you.</p>
<p>{mospagebreak title=MGE Titanium ATX Case &#8211; Conclusion}</p>
<p>Conclusion</p>
<p>This case is everything I was looking for and more. I think that about sums it up, doesn&#8217;t it? Heh. Ok, seriously, though:</p>
<p>Plus</p>
<ul>
<li>tons of room</li>
<li>large vents provide plenty of circulation</li>
<li>five fans included; three 92mm, two 80mm; all blue LED</li>
<li>seven fan rheobus</li>
<li>multi-function LCD control panel</li>
<li>extremely sturdy</li>
<li>unique</li>
</ul>
<p>Minus</p>
<ul>
<li>a bit heavy (really not all that bad, though)</li>
<li>front and top fans have constricted intake/exhaust issues</li>
<li>a bit tough to read the LCD if the case is on the floor</li>
</ul>
<p>All in all, MGE&#8217;s Titanium (or XG&#8217;s Quantum) is a pleasure to own. I&#8217;d<br />
heartily recommend it to anyone looking for a new enclosure for their<br />
rig.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekextreme.com/technology-news-archives/mge_titanium_atx_case-4054/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
